FEXLA

Hillside and tangential nozzles: what WRC 537 covers

A hillside nozzle stays in the bulletin with a larger pressure factor; a tangential or tilted one goes to the shell model.

FEXLA engineering · · 4 min read

Horizontal drum on a steel structure in a process plant at dusk, columns behind it
Fig. 1 · Horizontal drum on a steel structure in a process plant at dusk, columns behind it

WRC 537 is written for a radial nozzle, whose axis passes through the shell axis. A hillside nozzle, offset from that axis but parallel to the radial direction, stays in the calculator: the load stresses are worked as for a radial nozzle of the same diameter, and only the pressure stress factor grows. A tangential nozzle, or one tilted at a free angle, is outside the bulletin and goes to the shell model.

The line between the two is not a matter of taste. It comes from what the bulletin's shell theory can still describe.

Why a hillside nozzle can stay in WRC 537

Cut a round tube through a flat surface at an angle θ from the normal and the hole is an ellipse. Its short axis is the tube diameter d whatever the angle; its long axis is d/cos θ. The usual conservative practice for a non-radial nozzle is to take the short axis, the shortest chord, as the size of an equivalent round attachment. That is the same size as the radial nozzle, so the calculator uses the same r₀ and the same β, and the curve coefficients do not change.

minor axis = d major axis = d / cos θa tube of diameter d meeting a flat surface at θ from the normal

This rests on the flat-tangent-plane picture that the bulletin's shallow-shell theory uses throughout. It holds well for a small offset and grows less reliable as the angle grows. No safe tilt limit has been sourced, so the calculator states the assumption in the report and does not invent one.

The WRC 537 calculator's model of a nozzle offset 300 mm from the shell axis, with the load arrows ML and VL
Figure 2. A hillside nozzle in the calculator, entered by its offset from the shell axis. The loads act in the nozzle's own axes, as for a radial nozzle.
Quadrilateral shell mesh of a nozzle on a cylinder, finer near the junction
Figure 3. The shell mesh of a nozzle model: small elements at the junction where the stress changes fast, larger ones away from it.

What the offset changes: the pressure factor

Where a hillside nozzle differs is the pressure stress at its edge. The opening cut in the shell is longer round the circumference than the nozzle is wide, so pressure acts on a larger area. The calculator works the pressure stress intensity factor I of ASME Section VIII Division 2 with that longer cut.

  • On a cylinder, the nozzle is entered with its offset from the shell axis. The radius used in the pressure force is half the arc length of the opening in the circumferential plane, never less than the nozzle radius (4.5.6).
  • On a formed head, the nozzle is entered as hillside (axis parallel to the vessel axis, away from the pole) or perpendicular (axis square to the vessel axis). The radius used is Rₙ/cos θ or Rₙ/sin θ (4.5.11).
  • A head nozzle marked tilted without saying which gets the radial factor, with a note: a non-radial head nozzle can have a factor up to about a third higher.

What the calculator refuses

Three cases are refused with a message that names the shell model. A nozzle inclined at a free angle in a shell or head. An offset or tilted nozzle on a cone, where only a radial nozzle or one along the cone's own axis is taken. And a tangential nozzle, whose axis runs along the shell's surface rather than into it.

The tangential case shows plainly why. As the angle from the normal approaches 90°, the long axis d/cos θ grows without limit. The model's own geometry has stopped describing the junction: the nozzle no longer pierces a nearly flat patch of shell, it runs along a curved one. That is a sign the shallow-shell assumption has failed, not a real result.

What the shell model does instead

The shell model builds the nozzle along its real axis and meshes the real intersection curve with the shell. The orientations it takes are radial, offset (hillside), tangential, angled, tilted in any direction, and on heads parallel or perpendicular to the vessel axis.

NozzleWRC 537 in the calculatorShell model
Radial, cylinder, head or coneYesYes
Hillside on a cylinderYes, larger pressure factorYes
Hillside or perpendicular on a headYes, larger pressure factorYes
Tilted at a free angleRefusedYes, under 75°
TangentialRefusedCylinder or cone, round only
Offset on a flat plateNot offeredRefused: move the nozzle instead
Where each orientation can be run today.

A tangential nozzle is placed so its outside wall lines up with the shell's inside surface, on either side. It must be round, and its outside radius must be smaller than the shell's inside radius. The optional solid detail at the junction does not take tangential nozzles or tilts over 50°.

Where it stops

  1. 01The calculator takes no tilt angle: the hillside result rests on the shortest-chord convention and the shallow-shell picture, and is less reliable as the offset grows.
  2. 02The hand-over to the shell model carries the geometry, not the loads, because the two tools set their load axes differently today. Enter the loads again in the shell model's axes.
  3. 03Opening reinforcement for pressure is not sized here; take it from your vessel program.
  4. 04The finite-element results are early access and under verification. Until that is finished they are not a source of design values.
B-17

Try it in FEXLA

The Nozzle loads card takes a radial or hillside nozzle on a cylinder and a round nozzle on a head or cone, and opens the shell model for the rest.

Open the card

References

  • WRC Bulletin 537: Precision Equations and Enhanced Diagrams for Local Stresses in Spherical and Cylindrical Shells due to External Loadings.
  • ASME Section VIII Division 2, 4.5.6 (hillside nozzle in a cylinder), 4.5.10 and 4.5.11 (radial and non-radial nozzles in formed heads).

Method notes this draws on

Next post: Large openings beyond UG-36(b): why the rules stop and what replaces them

Educational article. It explains principles and is not design guidance; follow your governing code and edition.